Wig Ban at Senegal's National Theatre Reversed After Public Backlash

 

A sudden ban on wigs, hair extensions, and skin-lightening products at the Grand Théâtre de Dakar sparked national outrage in Senegal, forcing a swift reversal just one day later. The policy, announced via an internal memo by theatre director Serigne Fall Guèye and stamped by the Ministry of Culture, was intended to promote "Pan-African values" and protect the theatre's cultural identity.

See also:  Burkina Faso Junta Scraps Electoral Commission, Tightens Grip on Power

Critics swiftly condemned the move as sexist and paternalistic, accusing Guèye of using cultural nationalism to control women's bodies. Feminist groups and civil society activists linked the policy to wider concerns about gender inequality in Senegal, including the underrepresentation of women in President Bassirou Diomaye Faye's cabinet and the recent dissolution of the Ministry of Women.

Guèye, a prominent figure in the ruling Pastef party known for its anti-colonial and pan-African stance, previously led its cultural commission. His supporters defended the ban as a gesture of cultural pride, but detractors argued it reduced African identity to physical appearance while ignoring deeper systemic issues such as language preservation, education reform, and economic justice.

Political analysts said the controversy reveals growing frustration among progressive supporters of Prime Minister Ousmane Sonko, who feel alienated by what they see as the government’s increasingly conservative direction. Sociologist Mame Diarra Thiam argued that real cultural affirmation should focus on meaningful reforms, not superficial mandates.

Public intellectual Henriette Niang Kandé also criticized the ban in a widely shared post, calling it impractical and discriminatory. The backlash underscored deeper societal tensions surrounding gender, identity, and post-colonial values in Senegal.

Faced with intense pressure, Guèye reversed the ban on Tuesday, calling the reaction a misunderstanding. But the episode has left a lasting impact, igniting ongoing debate over who defines African identity and how it should be expressed.