- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6–3 on Friday in favor of a group of parents seeking the right to opt their children out of public school lessons involving LGBTQ+ content that conflicts with their religious beliefs. The case centered on Maryland’s Montgomery County Public Schools, which had previously allowed opt-outs but reversed that policy in the 2023–2024 school year, leading to a legal challenge.
The majority opinion, written by Justice Samuel Alito, found that the school district violated the First Amendment by denying parents the opportunity to be notified and opt out. The justices ruled that this decision substantially interfered with the religious upbringing of the children involved. The ruling grants a preliminary injunction, allowing parents to refuse participation while the broader case proceeds.
Parents from Muslim, Christian, and Jewish backgrounds brought the case, arguing that books introduced in classrooms were not neutral educational tools but conveyed specific values. Alito cited books such as “Uncle Bobby’s Wedding” and “Born Ready,” stating they celebrate same-sex marriage and transgender identity in ways that young children are likely to absorb without question. He emphasized that the parents are not trying to control the curriculum but simply want the ability to exempt their children from specific content that burdens their religious beliefs.
In a strong dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor warned that the ruling undermines public education by giving parents too much control over curriculum decisions. She argued the decision will create administrative chaos, forcing schools to manage a wide range of opt-out requests on religious grounds.
The ruling marks a major development in the ongoing national debate over LGBTQ+ inclusion in schools and parental rights in public education. It reflects the deep ideological divide within the court and the broader American public on these issues.
See also: US Senate REJECTS Iran war limits on Trump
Comments
Post a Comment