Paul Scholes Slammed for 'Worst Punditry Ever' as Chelsea Fans Rage Over Viral Moises Caicedo Comments

 

Paul Scholes, a Manchester United icon turned pundit, has ignited a firestorm online after criticizing Chelsea midfielder Moises Caicedo, prompting fans to brand his remarks as some of the worst punditry ever. Scholes questioned Caicedo’s quality, creativity, and ability to dictate matches, casting doubt on the £115 million star’s impact since joining Chelsea. His comments, which went viral, drew swift and fierce backlash from supporters and analysts who accused him of delivering lazy, uninformed analysis that ignored both Caicedo’s performances and hard data.

Statistics tell a different story. In the 2024-25 Premier League season, Caicedo logged 3,815 minutes, more than any Chelsea player, and topped the league in passes, tackles, and possession won. His standout campaign earned him the Chelsea Player of the Season award, underscoring his pivotal role in the squad. Fans, including voices like @ArsenalMediaXI and @falsewinger

 on X, slammed Scholes for overlooking these metrics and Caicedo’s visible influence on the pitch. Many argued his critique lacked nuance, with some pointing to his history of controversial takes as evidence of declining punditry credibility.

see also: Sheffield Wednesday charged by EFL over failure to pay wages on time

The uproar highlights a broader frustration with pundits who rely on outdated narratives rather than engaging with current form or analytics. Caicedo, widely praised for his work rate and versatility, has become a cornerstone for Chelsea, making Scholes’ comments appear particularly misguided. While Scholes remains a respected figure for his playing career, this incident has fueled calls for more accountability in football analysis, with fans demanding pundits back their claims with evidence. 

As the debate rages on, Caicedo’s performances continue to silence doubters, proving his worth to Chelsea’s ambitions in the Premier League.