The World Is Furious About Trump's Latest Move - Here's Why

 




In a move that has sent ripples through international development circles, US President Donald Trump has issued an executive order halting all foreign assistance programs for a 90-day review period. This decision, primarily aimed at realigning foreign aid with the "America First" policy, has placed USAID (United States Agency for International Development) at the center of global discussions, particularly in Nigeria where the agency's footprint in health, security, and development has been significant.



READ ALSO: President Félix Tshisekedi's Test: Can the DRC President Turn the Country Around?

The State Department has clarified that this pause is intended to ensure that all foreign aid initiatives are both efficient and in line with current US foreign policy objectives. However, the immediate impact of this suspension is causing concern among many, especially in regions heavily dependent on US aid for critical services.




The Health Sector Impact


One of the most alarming consequences of this executive order is the potential disruption to HIV treatment programs, particularly through the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR). For Nigeria and many other African countries, PEPFAR has been a lifeline, providing antiretroviral drugs, prevention measures, and support for those living with HIV/AIDS. The halt in funding could lead to breaks in treatment, which is not only a health risk but could reverse years of progress in managing the epidemic. Moreover, malaria control programs, another cornerstone of USAID’s work, might face similar challenges, potentially increasing mortality rates in regions where malaria is a leading killer.


Posts on X (formerly Twitter) from users in Nigeria have reflected immediate panic, with individuals advised to stock up on medications for at least a year, signaling an acute awareness of the potential long-term effects of this funding freeze. 




Security and Development Programs


Beyond health, USAID's involvement in security initiatives, like those in Mexico and Colombia, where it supports anti-narcotics training for local police forces, is also at a standstill. This suspension could lead to a temporary increase in drug trafficking activities or a decrease in law enforcement capabilities, at a time when cooperation is crucial to combat transnational crime. 


In Nigeria, where USAID supports numerous development projects ranging from agriculture to education, the sudden halt means projects might be left incomplete or staff could face unemployment, a scenario highlighted by local X posts discussing the immediate economic impacts on those employed by or working with USAID programs.


Global Reaction and Critique


The global response to Trump's executive order has been mixed. Critics argue that this broad suspension could lead to significant setbacks in global health, security, and development. Humanitarian organizations have expressed fears that the pause is not just administrative but could be a precursor to substantial cuts or reorientation of aid away from humanitarian needs towards more politically motivated goals. This perspective is echoed by experts who warn that such a move might not only cost lives but also diminish US influence and goodwill internationally at a time when strategic competitors like China are expanding their soft power through aid.


On the other hand, proponents of the executive order might argue that this is an opportunity to ensure fiscal responsibility, focusing aid on areas that directly benefit US strategic interests or are more aligned with implementing policies that reflect current administration priorities. They might also see this as a chance to cut what they perceive as wasteful or misaligned spending, thereby making foreign aid more efficient and impactful.


READ ALSO: WATCH THIS Space: Mercy Chinwo and Eezee Tee's Gospel Music Drama Is About to Get Real!


The 90-day review period will be telling. It's an interval where the future of many lives, the trajectory of international health, and the stability of security in various countries hang in balance. The review's outcomes will need to address how to best serve both American interests and the humanitarian needs of recipient countries. There's a palpable tension around whether this period will lead to a renaissance in aid efficiency or if it will mark a retreat from America's traditionally generous role in global development.


For Nigeria and similar nations, the coming months will be critical. NGOs, local governments, and international partners will need to strategize how to manage or mitigate the effects of this funding pause. Meanwhile, the global community watches, waiting to see how this bold move by Trump reshapes the landscape of international aid, potentially setting new precedents for how one of the world's leading economies approaches its role in global development.

Comments